Gutless Greet Wilders and His Racist Supporters Are Megabyte Nazis Indeed!

Gutless Greet Wilders and His Racist Supporters Are Megabyte Nazis Indeed!

Further to Gutless Greet Wilders and His Racist Supporters I’ve posted the following comments in these links:

1. Dutch MP faces trial for hate speech

2. The New Dutch Government, the EU, and the Wilders Trial

“Does any Muslim trotting the globe and inciting hate against the Christians like Wilders? The answer is no.

Does any Muslim calling to behead the Catholics (an old practice of England) for the existence of 10% child molesters in the church? NO.

So, what is your problem Ingrid? Your knowledge (?) about Islam is astounding!

Could you kindly let us know;
1. Which part of Quran permits Muslims to kill non-Muslims?
2. If anyone was killed simply for not being Muslim?
3. How many Muslims were stoned to death?
4. Why is it that when non-Muslims commit suicide, no one mentions anything about virgins or the afterlife?”

In both cases the following message appeared, “Duplicate comment detected; it looks as though you’ve already said that!” and they murdered free speech!

Surely, Gutless Greet Wilders and His Racist Supporters are megabyte Nazis indeed!

Gutless Greet Wilders and His Racist Supporters

For more: Gutless Greet Wilders and His Racist Supporters

Further to Greet Wilders and Freedom of Speech below (Faruque Ahmed (14:18:22) : Your comment is awaiting moderation) gutless Wilders and his supporters venting racism while hiding between mum’s two legs!

“2 10 2010

Ravi Ranjan Singh (16:49:27) :

Once treated of Arab Absurdity Mania all Great Races like Persians, afghans, Tazaks etc. will be humans again.
Regarding Arabs they will be either camel washing or be in most popular item in Magic Shows, Museums and Zoo.”

Probably Ravi Ranjan Singh does not know the fact that without advent of Islam and Christianity, the Indians would have no choice but to become homosexuals today! Remember, it was the Muslims who influenced and saved Indian women from mass murders emanating from Satidaho, dowry and many other barbaric practices. Kopalkundola and many great works of Hindu reformers are only a few examples in support of my statement unlike false and fabricated anti-Muslim incitements of gutless Greet Wilders and his racist supporters due prejudice and bigotry. They are megabyte Nazis indeed.

Greet Wilders and Freedom of Speech

For more: Greet Wilders and Freedom of Speech

VVD Liberals overtake anti-Islam party in latest poll

27 09 2010

From DutchNews.nl:

The right-wing VVD Liberals have overtaken Geert Wilders’ anti-Islam PVV in the latest Synovate opinion poll, news agency Novum reports on Friday.

The VVD is now on 32 seats, one up on its total in the June election, while the PVV is on 31, up seven.

Read the rest.

---

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

• Liveblog: 2010 Tweede Kamer Elections
• Michael Ignatieff: Resurgent!
• After the Dutch elections

« Indonesian ambassador ‘unwise’ to say PVV voters may be ‘psychotic’ Negotiators in last dash for coalition agreement »

Actions

• Comments RSS
• Trackback

Information

• Date : September 27, 2010
• 
  
• Categories : Uncategorized

6 responses

30 09 2010

Faruque Ahmed (12:00:56) :

Greet Wilders of Indonesian mother and Dutch father is audaciously anti-Muslim and shamelessly pro-Israel similar to infamous Ayaan Hirshi Ali and “expired” Ershad Manji!

During a lecture, Geert Wilders quoted:

"The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is Jihad. Israel is simply receiving blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel to address the grievances of our own Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West. It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. Therefore, it is not the West that has a stake in Israel, it is Israel".^[92]

Therefore the obvious question is, “who is aiding and abetting them? Israel, USA or any other warmongers?!

30 09 2010

Ravi Ranjan Singh (19:02:24) :

be happy in your day/night dreaming of 73 Virgins, don’t disturb humans. Geert is for truth, those who are scared of truth and progress can say anything, human race is not concerned.
World has moved from camel racing to 2010.

1 10 2010

Faruque Ahmed (10:32:30) :

What truth and humanity are you talking about? Burning the beach alive at the pier and killing women for dowry?

Do you like to burn your wife alive?

Few reliable records exist of the practice before the time of the Gupta empire, approximately 400 AD. After about this time, instances of sati began to be marked by inscribed memorial stones. The earliest of these are found in Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, though the largest collections date from several centuries later, and are found in Rajasthan. These stones, called devli, or sati-stones, became shrines to the dead woman, who was treated as an object of reverence and worship. They are most common in western India.^[2]

Muslims made attempts to save Hindu women!

In the Upper Gangetic plain, while it occurred, there is no indication that it was especially widespread. The earliest known attempt by a government to stop the practice took place here, that of Muhammad Tughlaq, in the Sultanate of Delhi in the 14th century.^[23]

Humayun issued a royal fiat against sati, which he later withdrew.

Guru Nanak, the first Guru of the Sikhs spoke out against the practice of sati.

On 4 December 1829, the practice was formally banned in the Bengal Presidency lands, by the then governor, Lord William Bentinck

Following the outcry after the Sati of Roop Kanwar,^[44] the Indian Government enacted the Rajasthan Sati Prevention Ordinance, 1987 on October 1, 1987^[45] and later passed the Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987.^[6]

1 10 2010

Ravi Ranjan Singh (14:42:49) :

Stoning, rape 71 & Virgins, think beyond that. Humanize first, discuss Sati or anything after.

1 10 2010

Ravi Ranjan Singh (14:45:42) :

Anyway, how is Geert related to Sati?

1 10 2010

Ingrid (21:25:06) :

Ravi that is right! So right! What you said! All of that I second. And if people only knew this Islam, everyone of sound mind and pure heart would agree.

Making a muddle of blaming of ancient sati practice is to assuage his conscience. Instead of that, please Mr. Ahmed, lets look at reality and address those things.

Do you know the life of Mohammed?
Then, let us talk.

And you cannot blame Geert Wilders for being anti-Muslim, even ‘audaciously’ anti-Muslim. Even rambunctiously anti-Muslim would be a virtuous stance, when truth be known. Of course, he cannot be rambunctious, he is a diplomat. But what he says is truth, and it is enough to state the truth with dignity.
Please face your facts about Islam and Allah and Mohammed, with dignity.

Thank you

2 10 2010

Faruque Ahmed (14:18:22) : Your comment is awaiting moderation

It is very difficult if not possible to debate with dignity when two of my postings in response to Ravi Ranjan Singh were murdered! It is fairly obvious that you people love to insult and attack Muslims with false and fabricated reasons and grounds. You are not interested to expose Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, … !

Yes, it is true that Islam saved millions from the evil of sati, dowry and many notorious and inhumane practices!

Rabbis Teachings on sex with infants and animals: Jewish Teachings on sex with infants:

“A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. If he penetrates and the child is harmed then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl however would not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister.
“The complete Hebrew text of this saying can be found in “Rabbi Joseph in Talmud: Bammidber raba and Jalkut”

Jewish Shariah (“hadith”) and Stone to Death

…[in the event of sex between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman] the main punishment is inflicted on the Gentile woman ; she must be executed , even if she was raped by the Jew .” (from: Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years by Israel Shahak, p87)

Jewish Venom Continuum

Jewish Venom Continuum

Further to Contemporary Jewish Quotes About non-Jews, Pre-Contemporary Jewish Quotes About non-Jews, Settler Rabbi publishes “The complete guide to killing non-Jews” — UPDATED and Zionism Is Incompatible With Any Society please find out more Jewish venom.

Washington Watch: Incitement, Israeli style

By D. BLOOMFIELD
09/01/2010 23:18

It is no excuse to shrug off Ovadia Yosef's invective by saying the Arabs are worse. Since when does Israel measure its moral stature by that yardstick?

Talkbacks (13)

The light unto the nations dimmed a bit more this week.

Shas mentor Rabbi Ovadia Yosef called for a plague to strike the Palestinian people dead. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said the rabbi doesn't speak for him or his government, but stopped short of condemning the hateful message. Only two American Jewish organizations rebuked Yosef over the following couple of days without being asked by reporters.

Imagine the Jewish outrage if a Palestinian leader had said, "May our enemies and those who hate us be put to an end" and may God "smite them with plague."

Those were Yosef's words. Shas's votes are critical to keeping Netanyahu in power. That may explain his tepid, albeit quick, reaction to Yosef's apparent effort to undermine him on the eve of his departure for peace talks in Washington.

Netanyahu, who faces Palestinian demands to continue the settlement freeze that is due to expire September 26, had been expected to respond that he kept his commitment on construction, but the Palestinians have failed to curb anti-Israel incitement, as they've been promising for the past 17 years.

Now Yosef has undercut him. Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat has accused Yosef of advocating genocide; this time he's not exaggerating.

How does Yosef's call for wiping out the Palestinians differ from Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's desire to wipe Israel off the map? It would be easy to shrug off this episode as the rantings of a senile old man nearing 90. But Yosef is no newcomer to incitement. His attitude toward women has been likened to that of the Taliban. He regularly vilifies fellow Jews who don't share his extreme views; he has said Holocaust victims were a reincarnation of sinners from prior generations, Israeli soldiers killed in Lebanon were suffering God's retribution for their lack of Torah observance, Hurricane Katrina victims were punishment for US support of the Gaza withdrawal, and he has called Palestinians "cockroaches" that should be annihilated.

AND HE is not alone. Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman has told the president of Egypt to "go to hell," called for bombing the Aswan Dam and advocated the transfer of Palestinians out of Israel. Sephardi Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar has accused Reform Jews of trying to "remove Torah from Israel" and "impose the lifestyle of others, including violence, immodesty and assimilation" on a hapless Israel. During the Gaza withdrawal, right-wing rabbis told their followers in the IDF to disobey their officers.

Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro recently published a book declaring "there is nothing wrong with the murder" of gentiles, including women, children and righteous gentiles "even if they are not responsible for the threatening situation" but might be a threat some day in the future. How does that differ from the justification Arab terrorists use for killing Israeli children – they could grow up to be Israeli soldiers? Yosef's call for a plague on Palestinians only days before the Washington conference looked very much like an attempt to sabotage the peace talks even before they began. An unnamed Shas aide, apparently attempting damage control, told one Israeli paper that Yosef privately supports continuing the settlement freeze, but another denied it.

When Netanyahu demands an end to Palestinian incitement, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas can tell him to "get your own house in order."

Make no mistake, Palestinian incitement is far worse and more pervasive than Israeli incitement, but that is no excuse for tolerating and even venerating hate-mongers like Ovadia Yosef, who erode Israel's moral authority and diminish prospects for a real peace.

Incitement is a more serious threat to peace than settlements, because it undermines the public support and goodwill both leaders will need when they try to sell their constituents the tough compromises they claim they are prepared to make.

There's no shortage of Israeli politicians and Jewish organizations quick to condemn Muslim leaders for failing to denounce Islamic extremists, but when the incitement comes from a prominent rabbi, they're suddenly struck dumb. Two rare exceptions were the Reform Movement, which called Yosef's comments "morally reprehensible," and the Anti-Defamation League, which declared that "incendiary expressions contribute to a potentially dangerous environment of intolerance and hatred."

Most other organizations were silent or had to be prodded for a comment.

State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley rightly condemned Yosef's "inflammatory" words as "deeply offensive" and damaging to "the cause of peace."

But where is he when Muslim leaders (except for Ahmadinejad) hurl similar invective at Israel and Jews? It is no excuse to shrug off Yosef's invective by saying the Arabs are worse. Since when does Israel measure its moral stature by that yardstick?

bloomfieldcolumn@...

Women! Why Do You Attack Islam?

Women! Why Do You Attack Islam?

Introduction:

The issue of gender equity is important, relevant, and current. Debates and writings on the subject are increasing and are diverse in their perspectives. The Islamic perspective on the issue is the least understood and most misrepresented by non-Muslims and some Muslims as well. This article is intended to provide a brief and authentic exposition of what Islam stands for in this regard.

Status of Women in the Holy Quran

The Economic Aspect of Women in Islam

The Social Aspect of Women in Islam

The Legal and Political Aspect of Women in Islam

Women in Ancient Civilizations:

One major objective of this article is to provide a fair evaluation of what Islam contributed toward the restoration of woman’s dignity and rights. In order to achieve this objective, it may be useful to review briefly how women were treated in general in previous civilizations and religions, especially those which preceded Islam (before 610 AD). Part of the information provided here, however, describes the status of woman as late as this century, more than 13 centuries after Islam.

What Was The Status of The Mosaic Women?

What Was the Position of the Christian Church re Women?

What Was The Status of The Indian Women?

What Was The Status of The Athenian Women?

What Was The Status of The Roman Women?

What Was The Status of The Scandinavian Women?

What Was The Status of The British Women?

Conclusion:

The status which non-Muslim women reached during the present era was not achieved due to the kindness of men or due to natural progress. It was rather achieved through a long struggle and sacrifice on woman’s part and only when society needed her contribution and work, more especially during the two world wars, and due to the escalation of technological change. While in Islam such compassionate and dignified status was decreed, not because it reflects the environment of the seventh century, nor under the threat or pressure of women and their organizations, but rather because of its intrinsic truthfulness.

If this indicates anything, it would demonstrate the Divine origin of the Quran and the truthfulness of the message of Islam, which, unlike human philosophies and ideologies, was far from proceeding from its human environment; a message which established such humane principles that neither grew obsolete during the course of time, nor can become obsolete in the future. After all, this is the message of the All-Wise and All-Knowing God whose wisdom and knowledge are far beyond the ultimate in human thought and progress.

(To go back close this window)

_____________________________

Footnotes:

(1) This article is an edited version of the booklet (or pamphlet) entitled Women in Islam, compiled by Mostafa Malaekah, from Dr. Jamal Badawi’s The Status of Woman in Islam and Gender Equity in Islam. To receive the original version of this booklet by e-mail, contact Mostafa Malaekah at malaekah@hotmail.com.

Previous

Contents

Next

Home Page: www.islam-guide.com